What Happened to Mystery in Music Marketing?

July 31, 2012{ 12 Comments }

TOM WAITS 300x166 What Happened to Mystery in Music Marketing?

No more marketing jargon!

Since successful independent musicians these days are expected to be marketing-savvy, it’s not surprising that you occasionally hear jargon like “value added,” “direct-to-fan,” and “call to action” slip into communications with fans.

I find it a bit creepy though. While these terms are fine if you’re discussing the concept behind certain actions, your fans don’t want to hear the awkward grinding of your marketing machine’s gears. They want the tunes, the tour dates, the story, the drama, the connection.

What is the opposite of a “call to action?”

Let’s take a step back for a minute.  It seems obvious that the easiest way to get someone to do what you want (buy a CD, check out a review, attend a concert, etc.) is to quickly and clearly convey both the benefit and the steps someone must take to achieve that benefit. While this is true in most cases, there are plenty of examples where a connection is forged with fans through the exact opposite of a clear “call to action”– with elements of mystery and disinformation.

A perfect example arrived in my inbox today from Tom Waits.

The email from Epitaph Records was titled “Tom Waits: Permission to Come Aboard?” The body of the email was an image of Tom dressed as an eyepatch-wearing pirate, wielding a cutlass– and it simply said “Coming August 7th.”

What was coming? An album? A tour? A film? A Tom Waits-themed pirate cruise? The blogosphere is abuzz. Rolling Stone, Brooklyn Vegan, San Francisco Weekly, they’re all wondering what the hell is gonna happen come August 7th! And when August 7th rolls around he’s going to have double the coverage– the teaser plus the actual news.

Tom Waits is an artist who can get away with this kind of thing. If it were some other artist, we might find such an unhelpful email annoying, or worse— assume they’d left out some crucial info by accident. But from Waits,… it’s cool.

Is mystery “scalable” for indies?

We can’t all be as strange as Waits, as willfully obscured as Radiohead, as aloof as Pink Floyd– but there must be some way that independent artists today can step away from their 24-hour availability via Twitter, Facebook, blog, YouTube, Last.fm, etc., if only for a few moments– and hint at some enigma worthy of their fans’ best sleuthing skills.

What do you think? Is mystery possible in the age of social media? What are some good examples of independent artists teasing their fans without annoying them? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comments section below.

Use CD Baby for worldwide physical and digital distribution: because one thing that shouldn’t be a mystery is where to purchase your music! 

 

  • http://howtorunaband.com Chris “Seth” Jackson

    Hey, Chris! I just saw Tom’s email this morning, as well. However, I have to disagree with your take here.

    I think there is plenty of opportunity to do this type of thing with your fans. In fact, I think it makes things way more fun than just saying everything up front.

    Most bands seem to give you everything and the kitchen sink in one flyer. That’s it. Nothing left to the imagination. No suspense. No build-up.

    Curiosity is one of the biggest human motivators there is! Just because we are available 24-7 doesn’t mean we can’t have mystery!

    Examples:

    Our next show will contain something new you have never before seen from us. AND you will never see it again! It’s insane and hopefully won’t get us kicked out of the club! Sign up here to get a “hint” in a few days.

    We are printing 100 special CDs with a secret song. Only 100 of these with the secret song will ever be printed. If you don’t get it now, you will never hear this song again.

    Get ready. This summer, we have cooked up something no other band has ever done. Sign up to get hints.

    Anyways, that’s just a quick brainstorm. But, I think curiosity is an essential element for every band to incorporate into their marketing. As long as it’s not overdone, it’s a great way to get attention and get fans excited!

    Honestly, I wish more bands would be a bit more mysterious and curiosity grabbing.

    Am I missing something, Chris? Why wouldn’t an everyday, joe-shmoe band be able to use this type of marketing?

    • http://diymusician.cdbaby.com/author-chris-robley Christopher Robley

      Hey Chris, I wasn’t trying to say they couldn’t. In fact, I was hoping to hear some good examples (like the ones you provided) of how it could be done on a smaller indie scale. And hoping that bands would be able to be more mysterious. I was just doubtful that a relatively unknown artist could do something as vague as Tom and expect the hype machine to follow.

      • http://howtorunaband.com Chris “Seth” Jackson

        Ah, I get what you’re saying. Well, if you have no hype machine in the first place, then no! Still, I’m more likely to talk about a band that has a creative pitch going on than a band that never does anything to peak my curiosity.

        Curiosity is one of the main drivers in marketing: music or otherwise. A good dose can liven up any campaign whether you’re unknown or not.

        If you’re unknown, maybe it’s even better to use curiosity and mystery…

  • Jeffreygeorgemoline

    Tom Waits is a known commodity. If an Indie artist sent something like this out they’d likely have a restraining order put in place.

  • Amigo_40

    post songs preproduced and blow there minds when they hear the final package (Don’t be afraid, be very afraid :)

  • Koski Project Studios

    I think so, its definitely tricky, and i think it takes much more than just a post on face book that says, “hey guys we got a new cd coming out soon! stay tuned!” because no one is going to give 2 craps, or even take note. With so much accessibility, you have to woo your fans these days with an attention grabber and something that stands out above the constant noise of the Blahbo-sphere. Heres a teaser trailer for a new video I’m producing for a band. I think it is inticing, and several moths after I’ve posted this, I still have people asking, “hey, whats going on with that animation thing you’re doing?”.

    check out the video here:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gQS34Jum5Q

  • junglephysicians

    Great article.

  • http://twitter.com/TreyRoque DrewPower

    Agreed. I’m quite suspcious of the whole ‘doctor on call’ approach to social media. It’s one thing to be a fan and enjoy a semi-sincere exchange, but another to have the rock star come live on your computer.

    Dylan and Neil Young too have wilfully used mystery and outright obfuscation to futher their marketing.

    Partly, I guess, as a way of coping with the tripe people force on them (“What is the deeper significance of Idiot Wind?” blah), but also as a way of getting fans talking to each other trying to solve the puzzle themselves.

    And, hey, don’t Apple do the same?

    The link between these three examples is this, though – they have almost always had a kick ass product to back it up. It’s this stark contrast to much of the music out there that’s the kicker.

    • http://diymusician.cdbaby.com/author-chris-robley Christopher Robley

      Good point. I forgot that Apple does this same thing. Almost every time.

  • http://www.diroski.com/ Gemma D Lou

    Hello Chris

    Yeah. I think there’s scope to being mysterious, but in history it tends to be something the band or the artist does as an extension of their personality or their mantra.

    Eg. Prince started off reaching out to the media with his first album or so. Then all of a sudden, the media couldn’t even find him, and the stories and the mystery was built around that. Plus there were always rumours. Rumours about him doing x, w and z, and it got everybody talking. He would have secret gigs after his main concerts where only a handful of folk determined to find out and listen to the whispers would be in-the-know, and bootleg material would reach fans willing to search hard for them. Even today, he does not own a website. He has a team who take his videos off youtube, and finding his stuff is incredibly difficult. It makes his fans appreciate his music when they do come across his stuff, be it, old or new, and it heightens his level of mystery. But his whole persona was built around mystery. It wasn’t a one off.

    Today I think a lot of folk are pushing people to go the social media route. To display all about themselves. To be at finger-tip reach. And many fans appreciate that, but along with that, you lose the mystery.

    Lady Gaga has however, found the balance. She can be both mysterious, and accessible (well sort of). Her facade his helped by the strange clothes she wears and imagery she portrays whether she’s out there at an award show, which is where fans normally to get to see artists being regular folk, or whether she’s in a music video which is all make-believe any way. She then uses social media to extend that level of mystery about herself and her world, that you never quite know who the lady behind Gaga is.

    Can indie bands copy that? Certainly. But I think before they can build mystery, they need a buzz. Something that gets folk talking. That means they’ll needing either media attention, be it locally, nationally, online or wherever, or an advertising campaign where they pay to be in front of folk, and being seen repetitively will heighten folks interest in them.

    But if they’re not naturally mysterious people, it would be hard to pull off long term. They would have to make a conscious decision to be so.

    Thanks for the post

  • Pencio

    This sounds me familiar. :-)
    We were talking something about this, some days ago here on CDBaby.